Accessibility
Where we stand
We are working toward WCAG 2.2 Level AA. We have not reached it and we are not claiming it. No independent audit has been done on this site, so any conformance badge here would be a guess dressed up as a fact. What follows is what we have actually built, and what we would like you to tell us.
What is true of the site today
Each of these was built deliberately:
- Pages are made of semantic HTML — real headings, real lists, real buttons and links — so a screen reader or a browser reading mode gets the structure rather than a wall of unlabeled boxes.
- Controls are standard HTML buttons, links and form fields, which the keyboard reaches by default, and whatever you have focused draws a visible outline. The assistant opens with a "Skip to question box" link so you are not tabbing through the header on every visit.
- The assistant has a light theme and a dark theme, chosen by a control there. The choice is yours and it is remembered; it does not follow your operating system's setting.
- Wide comparison tables scroll horizontally inside their own frame, so the table moves and the page underneath stays still.
- If your system asks for reduced motion, animation is switched off rather than merely shortened.
What we have not done
We have not commissioned an independent audit, we do not run a formal testing program with assistive technology, and we have not walked every flow end to end using only a keyboard. We have also not measured our color contrast against a ratio. That is the honest gap between "built with care" and "verified against a standard."
Tell us what is broken
If something on this site blocks you, email maggievinas@outlook.com. It helps enormously if you can say which page, which browser, and which assistive technology you were using — but send it anyway if you cannot. A person reads that inbox by hand, so allow a little time; we will tell you plainly whether we can fix it.